Which type of evidence would likely strengthen an argument the most?

Choosing a statistic derived from a recent research article as the type of evidence that would likely strengthen an argument the most is effective for several reasons. First, statistics provide quantitative data that can back up claims in a concrete manner, making the argument more compelling and credible. Unlike personal stories or opinions that may be subjective and based on individual experiences, statistics are typically based on systematic research and analysis, thus offering a broader perspective that can be replicated and verified.

Furthermore, when derived from a recent research article, such statistics are likely to reflect current trends and insights, showcasing the argument's relevance in today's context. This makes the evidence not only reliable but also timely, reinforcing the argument with the latest findings in the field.

In contrast, unverified personal stories may lack credibility, popular opinions from social media can often be biased or exaggerated, and vague claims without specific support offer little value to an argument. They do not provide the same level of assurance or factual grounding that research-backed statistics do.